Search
Review of grounds, places and execution methods.
Technical review of orders, reports, object of seizure, execution methods and available remedies in home, personal, digital or documentary searches.
The first review concerns the order and report: authority, alleged offence, place, objects sought, items seized, statements made and technical notes.
The object of seizure must be delimited. An excessively broad seizure may affect the person or professional activity beyond what is necessary.
No standard formula: every step depends on procedural position and available material.
Review of grounds, places and execution methods.
Control of the restricted object and its relevance to the allegation.
Analysis of phones, computers, accounts, forensic copies and digital documents.
The defence assesses review, return requests or data copy requests where access to devices or documents is essential.
In digital seizures, it is crucial to distinguish physical device, copied data, evidentiary relevance and preservation needs.
Every choice is assessed on the actual file: timing, evidence, procedural risk and human impact of the proceedings.
Identification of truly decisive points without dispersing defence work into marginal issues.
Assessment of statements, submissions, productions, applications and remedies according to the procedural stage.
Criminal proceedings may feel like a first conviction before judgment. Defence work must take this into account with rigour and clarity.
The report, any orders, the list of seized items and every document provided by officers.
Yes, where the grounds exist. The assessment depends on object, relevance and evidentiary purpose of the seizure.
Yes. This is why the scope of seizure, extraction methods and relevance of data must be checked.
A useful assessment requires the actual document: notice, order, report, complaint, judgment or document received.
Office in Piazza Umberto I, n. 1, 84121 Salerno, Italy. Technical and confidential criminal defence assistance.