Fraud
Distinction between criminal deception and contractual breach.
Assistance in proceedings for fraud, misappropriation, theft, robbery, extortion, damage and economic disputes with criminal relevance.
In fraud allegations it is necessary to verify whether there was criminally relevant deception, when it occurred and how it relates to the alleged damage.
A failed business deal is not enough: the entire contractual and documentary sequence must be analysed.
No standard formula: every step depends on procedural position and available material.
Distinction between criminal deception and contractual breach.
Analysis of possession title, agreements and failure to return.
Drafting of a documented complaint and assessment of economic damage.
For misappropriation and related matters it is central to understand why the asset or money was received, the parties’ agreements and later conduct.
The victim, in turn, must document asset transfers, return requests and damage precisely.
Every choice is assessed on the actual file: timing, evidence, procedural risk and human impact of the proceedings.
Identification of truly decisive points without dispersing defence work into marginal issues.
Assessment of statements, submissions, productions, applications and remedies according to the procedural stage.
Criminal proceedings may feel like a first conviction before judgment. Defence work must take this into account with rigour and clarity.
No. The title of possession, the parties’ agreements and concrete conduct must be assessed.
No. It must be verified whether deception existed at the relevant time and caused the damage.
Contracts, messages, bank transfers, invoices, receipts, deliveries, reminders and any document reconstructing the economic relationship.
A useful assessment requires the actual document: notice, order, report, complaint, judgment or document received.
Office in Piazza Umberto I, n. 1, 84121 Salerno, Italy. Technical and confidential criminal defence assistance.